Wednesday, March 31, 2021

MORE

RINKLES...

Seems my theory of the virus coming from the Wuhan Lab is getting more of a world wide look, to me it just stands to reason, they have a virology lab studying this virus (and many more) and suddenly this virus is present in the population in that area...there is no such thing as co incidence that close.  Think of the odds.  Do the odds favor this rare transmission from bat to human in some very vague wild animal market...or do you think the odds are more in favor of the virus being accidentally released from the lab via an employee who did something they should not have done?  A virus is going to take the easiest path....just like running water...

I do NOT think China did this on purpose, accidents do happen.   I do think the virus came out of that lab and they are covering up that fact and destroying evidence that would show the truth that yes it did come from the lab...they may not know exactly how it happened? 

 THIS is just my thoughts I posted this theory before and did a lot of research on it...that includes the fact there are American scientists who have worked in that lab in the past and they said various  COV viruses were being studied there and other viruses like SARS have escaped.  The odds of bat to human transmission in a normal setting are probably 1 in a million...but the odds that it escaped a lab where it was being studied, and handled is probably 1 in how ever many workers were working in that lab lets say 500. I was not able to find that information.  

The odds just went WAY up...when you take into consideration, a lab where workers come and go and this COV-2 virus is being studied, it is being propagated...It just makes common sense.  
Trump pulled the funding to the NIH, but that to me was stupid...we need foxes in the hen house...Yes stop the research, secure the facility, but pull out and now no feet on the ground? That is like saying ok you just do what you want...it does not mean we won't be affected because we pulled out they should have said "we will use the funding to destroy the virus in the lab and stop this type study when it is not in the best interest of civilization. 

THIS whole incident should be a huge heads up as to why we need to have better world co-operation and not less because we need transparency and the ability to know what other countries are up to and have avenues open to share technology and expertise.  THIS was a fairly simple virus...WHAT about something more viral?? The death rate could have been 10x what it was.  IF this virus did get out as I suspect from a careless work force at the Wuhan lab, then wouldn't it make more sense to have a reporting system where this lab felt it could safely report this and it could have saved so many lives...without fear of retaliation? 

First off I don't see the sense in having these viruses in LABS.  WHAT good does it do?  Knowing it exists is enough...They were not obviously studying a vaccine against it, so what were they studying in connection with it? MY theory, they were studying the speed of infection, the death rate, and the mutation of the virus...etc, somethings are best left unopend like Pandora's box. 

Obviously there are wrinkles in my theory and there are wrinkles in that LAB that need to be addressed... the WHO just said "it's extremely unlikely that the virus escaped the lab in Wuhan." that is not good enough to satisfy my curiosity...this is from Wikipedia:

U.S. molecular biologist Richard H. Ebright, who had expressed concern of previous escapes of the SARS virus at Chinese laboratories in Beijing and had been troubled by the pace and scale of China's plans for expansion into BSL–4 laboratories,[2] called the institute a "world-class research institution that does world-class research in virology and immunology" while he noted that the WIV is a world leader in the study of bat coronaviruses.[7]



Read this report and then make your own decision...

No comments:

Post a Comment

I no longer accept comments on this blog

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.