NUTTY...

HY DO VIGILANTIES REALLY THINK THEY HAVE THE RIGHT...

To take the law into their own hands?  What if we ALL did that?  So Im watching or keeping track is more appropriate of the two trials going on currently.  One is the Wisconsin killer Rittenhouse, who killed two and wounded one with an AK15 Semiauto rifle, during protests.  He claimed to be stopping "rioters" yet he was in the street running with them and Armed with this rifle.  People saw him and tried to disarm him because he shot one guy dead and then ran, if he was really there to protect property and render medical aide, why is he running from a man he just shot??? Wouldn't  you go over to him render aide, call 911 for EMS? Not this guy, he ran down the street and others chased him to try and stop him from shooting again...they were right, He shot the next man who tried to stop him from killing people, the fallen man was a hero, if it had been a Mall shooter and someone tried to stop him and was killed in the process, that person would he a hero.  Then the third man who wanted to disarm him he tried to kill but his aim was bad and he wounded him....

HOW is this self defense?  When you're trying to stop a running armed killer, he is trying to get away from what he did.....he was not running because they were gonna kill him.  He is trying to get away from being held accountable.  That is not self defense. 

The second trial is three white men who decided that a Black man who was checking out a house under construction was stealing.  The man was dressed in shorts n tee shirt.  How could he conceal anything in that attire, a saw, a 2 x 4, any tools or supplies, he had no bag, he had no backpack, he ran because this angry white man just rolled up on him in a pickup truck and said "hey I want to talk to you." He had no right to do that, him his dad, and a friend of theirs decided to give chase and stop this man for no good reason, other than they are vigilantes and that is what they do...instead of just calling the police and staying at home.  BUT they block him in such a way as he feels trapped, then they showed they were armed, and he tried to disarm the one on the ground and the guy SHOT him with a shotgun.  Dead. Now they are saying it was self defense...

And the Defense lawyer, goes ahead and questions McMichael on his past use of gun for self protection.  He relates a story from 2011 at an ATM at his bank and 3 guys coming in who said give  me your money, and he lifts his shirt to show he has a gun on him, they ran.  Then he relates a story of a man who got in his truck and he said it was a car jacking attempt, he grabbed his gun pointed it at the guy and told him to get out of his truck...NO police reports were provided...And yet he has just outlined a long history of vigilante activity.  Another time he relates how some things were stolen from a house nearby, not h is house, but a house so he starts cruising around to see if he can find anything suspicious, and he sees what he considers a homeless camp under a bridge.  So he goes home and gets his dad to back him up and drives up to the area and a man is fishing.  The defender asks, "were you armed?"  "Yes had a semiauto pistol in  his pocket." 

He approaches the fisherman, and asks him if he is living under the bridge, the man replies no, then he tells the man things are missing from a neighbors house, and man says well I know nothing of that...and then they call the police and tell them this guy is living under the bridge looks homeless and things have been stolen. 

Her cruises around looking for trouble, he is an aggressive vigilante and he  killed a man in cold blood...for doing NOTHING WRONG...but was trying to get out of the neighborhood cause they are chasing him.   They got out of their vehicles, and yelled at him to STOP...he does not he did not obey their orders...he turned and ran the other way...and then a 3rd man who has joined the pursuit in his truck heads him back towards them....and this idiot SHOT HIM when he tried to grab the shotgun out of his hands....he pulled the trigger. THREE TIMES.

GUILTY AND GUILTY as charged...

In my mind, they think they are superior due to they have a gun, they have a gun to get the upper hand on everyone...HOW dare that man turn and try to take his gun, doesn't he realize he is the one in charge?? They both  said he could have run the other way but he ran at me and grabbed at the gun...HOW dare he do such a "brazen" thing...using that word the Judge in the Rittenhouse case used, A right winged judge for sure, his ring tone is the same as the one Trump uses in his stupid rallies.  So this white man sat on the stand and says He was closing in on me, he was coming at me, I had to KiLL HIM...

Now his very words, to me, tell the truth, "He sees I have a weapon, and he kept coming." in other words, he disregarded my "authority" I have a gun....I am GOD! 

My words to people like this is: 
Fuck YOU!! And I hope the jury is not filled with right wing nuts who think the same way as these nuts do, its 7 women and 5 men only one person on that jury is a Black person.  

It's not even revenge, cause in both cases the killers did not even know the people they shot dead.